Главная | Журнал "Армия и общество" | Выставки | Конференции | Соц. опрос | СМИ о проектах | Контакты
5 апреля 2017
10 марта 2017
30 декабря 2016
21 декабря 2016
25 ноября 2016
28 апреля 2017
28 апреля 2017
28 апреля 2017
27 апреля 2017
27 апреля 2017
Результаты голосования:
О чем свидетельствует удачный пуск российских крылатых ракет из акватории Каспийского моря на расстояние 1,5 тыс. километров?
испытание новых образцов оружия
54%
демонстрационные действия в интересах укрепления военной безопасности
31%
бесполезная демонстрация «мускулов»
15%
Проголосовало: 13
I. The order of reviewing of manuscripts of scientific articles for publication injournals.
1. All scientific articles submitted to the journal, subject to peer review.
2. Executive Secretary and/or the editorial Council, the editorial Board determines the compliance of the article to the journal profile, the requirements for registration and sends it for review to the specialist, doctor or candidate of Sciences who are close to the topic scientific specialization. All reviewers are acknowledged experts on the subject of the reviewed materials and have in the past 3 years publications on the subject of the reviewed article.
3. Terms of reviewing in each case are determined by taking into account the creation of conditions for maximum rapid publication of articles.
                 
The review addresses the following questions:
• the contents of the articles stated in the title of the topic,
• conformity to modern achievements of science,
•the availability of readers from the point of view of language, style, arrangement of material, clarity of tables, charts, figures and formulas,
• the appropriateness of publishing articles based on the previously published publications,
• what are the concrete advantages and disadvantages of the article, what corrections and additions should be made by the author.
 
4. The reviewer recommends, recommends taking into account corrections of deficiencies noted or not recommend the article for publication in the journals included in the VAK List.
5. Reviews are certified in the manner prescribed in the institution where the reviewer works.
6. The review is confidential. The author of the article is given the opportunity to review the text of the review. The editorial office will send the authors copies of the reviews or a reasoned refusal, and shall also send copies of reviews to the Ministry of education and science of the Russian Federation upon receipt at the editors request.
Violation of confidentiality is possible only if the reviewer declares unreliability or falsification of materials contained in the article.
7. If the review contains recommendations on correction and revision of the article, the Executive Secretary send the text of the review with a proposal to take them into account in preparing a new version of the article or arguments (partially or completely) to refute them. The modified (revised) paper is resubmitted for review.
8. The article not recommended reviewer for publication, to be re-reviewed. Text negative review sent to the author by e-mail, Fax or regular mail.
9. The existence of positive review is not sufficient grounds for the publication of the article. The final decision on publication is made by the editorial Board and recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the editorial Board.
10. After the editorial Board decision on the admission of article for publication Executive Secretary informs the author and indicates the date of publication. The text of the review sent to the author by e-mail, Fax or regular mail.
11. The originals are kept in the editorial Board or the editorial office for five years.
 
II. The review should include the following information:
1. Full title of article, title of article, name of author.
2. Brief description of the issue addressed by the article.
3. The degree of urgency provided the articles.
4. The most important aspects disclosed by the author.
5. The recommendation for publication.
6. Academic title, academic degree, position, place of work, name of reviewer, stamp, signature.
 
 
III. Phrases that are recommended for writing a review of the scientific article:
• The author gives a detailed analysis...
• The author skillfully analyzes...
• The author of this article focuses...
• The author demonstrates a high level of knowledge in the field...
• Author with specific examples proves...
• The author on the basis of extensive factual material examines the...
• The author draws attention to the fact that...
• The author rightly notes...
• The author successfully argues his own point of view...
• The author proposed the original idea...
• The relevance of the present research lies in...
• The basic terms used by the author methodology...
• In the article the author considers...
• The article analyzes the main approaches...
• The article identified and disclosed the main problems...
• Important the article is to consider...
• All the contents of the article are logically interconnected and confirmed by citations from authoritative sources.
• This article demonstrates...
• Sufficient detail the author has studied (presents, presented, described)...
• Therefore, in this paper considerable attention is paid to...
• Sources cited in this article reflect the modern point of view on the studied problem.
• The positive sides of the work can be attributed...
• As a positive fact we can note that...
• The article is based on a detailed analysis...
• It should be emphasized that...
• Special attention in the study... given...
• Of particular interest is the conclusion...
• Special attention is given...
• The practical significance of this article lies in...
• The proposed approach to the study of problems...
• Discussed in the article the original concept...
• Peer-reviewed work represents a serious and interesting scientific article on the topic...
• Peer-reviewed work is distinguished by novelty and the conclusiveness of ideas.
• It should be noted that in this scientific article reveals a number of interesting aspects...
• The article is performed at a high scientific level, contains a number of conclusions of practical interest.
• The article contains a specific concept...
• The theoretical significance of this paper is to...
 
105064, Москва, а/я 360 Телефон: (495) 662-67-67 / Факс:(495) 662-67-68
E-mail: info@naukaxxi.ru